Frank Kratofil v. American Strategic Insurance Corp., (United States District Court Middle District of Florida Fort Myers Division) Case No. 2:24-CV-1163-JES-NPM
Eohgan Conlon and Stephanie Conlon v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, (United States District Court Middle District of Florida Tampa Division) Case No. 8:25-CV-687-KKM-SPF
Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Co., et al. United States District Court Middle District of Florida Tampa Division. Case No: 8:22-cv-2569-CEH-AEP
209 West Olympia, LLC v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Co., Case No. 2:24-CV-237-JLB-KCD(Middle District Court of Florida, Feb 3, 2025 – Judge Kyle C. Dudek)
(The court has denied plaintiff’s motion for a clerk’s default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) when defendant has appeared in court to defend by enforcing alleged settlement agreement, finding that such a default is viewed unfavorably by the courts; that is, “the rule does not contemplate the entry of default only upon a defendant’s failure to answer but rather upon a defendant’s failure to respond or defend against the allegations in complaint.”)
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Robert A. Lee, ASCO Services, Inc., et al, Case No. 6D2023-2377(Sixth District Court of Appeal of Florida, Feb 7, 2025 – Judge Keith R. Kyle)
(Court reversed and remanded final judgment for defendant in response plaintiff’s appeal to consider only benefits given up to the date of settlement, finding that Liberty Mutual was entitled to full reimbursement from defendant under Florida Statutes 440.39(3)(a), which does not specify timing and clauses that are affected by agreed settlement dates but that “the carrier shall recover a percentage of what it has paid”; that is, “the statute requires Liberty Mutual’s pro rata share to be determined based on the full amount of “benefits paid or to be paid.”)