The Court denied Plaintiff Nancy Gerald’s Motion to Remand, ruling that Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company’s removal was timely because the thirty-day removal period was triggered by the receipt of Plaintiff’s initial disclosures, not the presuit demand letter (Rocca v. Nat’l Specialty Ins. Co., 2020 WL 6036882, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 24, 2020); Med. & Exec. Offs. of Aventura, LLC v. Great Lakes Ins. SE, 603 F. Supp. 3d 1241, 1246 (S.D. Fla. 2022)). The Court emphasized that presuit communications do not trigger the removal clock under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(3).
https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2025-00254-15-2-cv