Progressive Express Ins. Co. v. CPI Trucking & Logistics, LLC, et al., 1: 22-cv-22360-KMW (U.S. Southern District of Florida, Sep 8, 2025 – Judge Kathleen M. Williams)

(Order granting in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment/Motion for Default Judgment, holding that plaintiff has no duty to defend or indemnify Defendants under the auto insurance policy. The Court denied plaintiff’s motion to the extent Progressive sought a declaration that the MCS-90 Endorsement does not apply, explaining that the endorsement—designed to ensure compensation when the underlying policy does not provide coverage and the carrier’s insurance is insufficient to meet federally mandated minimums or is not existent—cannot be adjudicated until liability in the underlying action is resolved.)
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-flsd-1_22-cv-22360/pdf/USCOURTS-flsd-1_22-cv-22360-3.pdf