(reversing the trial court’s dismissal of Ronald Zabriskie’s third amended complaint for breach of contract against First Protective Insurance Company, finding that the complaint sufficiently pleaded a cause of action under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.110(b) by alleging the necessary elements of a valid contract, material breach, and damages (Murciano v. Garcia, 958 So. 2d 423, 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)). The appellate court emphasized that the complaint’s factual allegations must be accepted as true and all reasonable inferences drawn in favor of the pleader (Graulau Maldonado v. Orange Cnty. Pub. Libr. Sys., 273 So. 3d 278, 279 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)).
https://supremecourt.flcourts.gov/content/download/2453358/opinion/Opinion_2024-1072.pdf