(Order denying defendants’ renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and move for a new trial involving two long-term care insurance policies issued by plaintiff, the court found it cannot conclude the jury’s determination that defendants engaged in recurrent fraudulent misrepresentations and concealments plaintiff relied on in continuing to pay defendants benefits past June 2019 is against the great weight of the evidence; that is, the court will not “substitute [its] judgment for that of the jury on [this disputed question] of fact” but “must defer to the jury’s determination.” Ard v. Sw. Forest Indus., 849 F.2d 517, 520, 522 (11th Cir. 1988).
https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2023-01125-256-6-cv