The Court denied the defendants’ motion for reconsideration of the order denying their motion for summary judgment, finding that there was a genuine dispute of material fact regarding the plaintiff’s exercise of due diligence in discovering the alleged fraud. The Court’s reasoning relied on the delayed discovery rule under Fla. Stat. § 95.031(2)(a) and the precedent set in Davis v. Monahan, 832 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2002)