(affirming the trial court’s decision, ruling that it did not abuse its discretion in denying Universal’s request to recall a witness for cumulative testimony, citing Gonzalez v. Martinez, 897 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) and Dade Cnty. v. Midic Realty, Inc., 549 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The Court emphasized that the trial judge has the discretion to limit cumulative evidence to avoid needless consumption of time, as supported by Woodson v. Go, 166 So. 3d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).)
https://supremecourt.flcourts.gov/content/download/2451605/opinion/Opinion_2024-0200.pdf